🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has stated to have scraped a vast number of tracks from Spotify and is preparing to publish them publicly.

Potential Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Training

Observers noted the apparent data breach could aid AI companies looking for material to train their technology.

A group called Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million entries of metadata such as artist and album names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not represent its full catalog.

“We have located and deactivated the malicious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” stated a Spotify spokesperson.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorised access identified a external actor collected public metadata and employed illicit methods to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Stated Goal and Concerns

Spotify does not think the music acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They claimed the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a means of sharing large digital files online.

“Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ copyright, said the leaked music would likely be utilized for developing AI models.

“Educating models on pirated material is unfortunately widespread in the tech sector, so this stolen music is almost certain to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website alludes to LibGen, a huge online archive of pirated books that has allegedly been used by Meta to develop its systems.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on the professional network that members of the public could in principle “build their own private free equivalent of the service”. The executive said it could also enable technology firms to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Proposals and Reactions

In the UK, creative professionals have raised concerns against a ministerial proposal to let AI companies use protected work without consent unless the rights holder signals. Virtually every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for technology, innovation and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The government has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.