🔗 Share this article

Industry experts have shown considerable doubt regarding optimistic predictions that US oil giants will swiftly pump tens of billions of dollars to rebuild the country's broken oil infrastructure.

Demand for Iron-Clad Guarantees

Absent an solid promise of financial backing from the US federal government, analysts expect international firms to act with great care.

“It is too early to speculate on any future business activities,” a spokesperson said in response.

The optimistic schedule of less than a year and a half has been boldly outlined. Yet, realistic assessments paint a longer timeline.

A More Realistic Timeline

“It is likely going to take 36 months for any significant production bounce,” noted one industry expert.

The analysis indicates oil companies would likely spend:

• Initial phase: Securing new regulatory frameworks.
• The second year: Commencing reconstruction of facilities.
• Final phase: Being able to meaningfully increase production.

This would lead to an boost of around half a million bpd maybe by the end of the decade.

Appetite Compared to Appetite for Spending

Analysts draw a important separation between firms' attention and their appetite to invest significantly.

“I think their curiosity is an high score, on a range of ten. But their willingness is a much lower, because there is significant uncertainty yet.”

Veteran diplomats in the country echo this sentiment. The thinking is that firms will politically talk up the opportunity while actually acting with deliberate slowness.

The Enormous Price Tag

The monetary investment would be enormous. Independent analysis suggest that increasing production by between half a million and a million barrels per day would require more than $10 billion in funding over two to three years.

But, returning output to previous levels of around 2.5 million bpd could require a monumental $80 billion to $90 billion over many more years.

The Outstanding Issue of Taxpayer Funding

The suggestion of energy companies being paid back by the government has been repeatedly floated. However, formal assurances on such a mechanism have not yet been announced.

This lack of clarity is the key impediment for the sector's reluctance. Operators seek safeguards against nationalization and the risk that a subsequent president could cancel any deal.

“It is essential to be protected from sovereign risk, that we’ve seen in Venezuela previously.”

In summary, while political promises runs strong, the operational risks suggest a path of extreme caution for any large-scale venture in the country's oil sector.